It is now clear that public policies are a lever for improving population health and well-being. What types of evidence should be used to support the adoption of healthy public policies? Some believe that evidence should be drawn from scientific experimentation, in accordance with an Evidence-Based Medicine approach; while others, adhering to the social sciences, emphasize the importance of contextual evidence and expert opinion.
The first point of view sometimes appears limited when applied to the very complex public policy sector. There are advantages to opting for a broader vision of science, combining reviews of rigorous scientific studies, both quantitative and qualitative, with other sources of information. Grey literature and experiential and tacit knowledge can yield information of significance to decision makers. This thematic day will allow participants, be they students, researchers, decision makers or public health professionals, to evaluate the relevance of various types of evidence and to reflect on the manner in which they are addressed and used to inform policy decisions.
10 AM to 10:10 AM
Word of welcome
Pierre Bergeron, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Director, Direction des systèmes de soins et des politiques publique, Institut national de santé publique du Québec
Conference animator: Michel O'Neill, Ph.D., Director of the doctoral program in community health and Full Professor of the sociology of health, community health and health promotion, Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université Laval
10:10 AM to 10:45 AM
What constitutes proof? An ethical perspective on evidence.
(No PowerPoint is available for this presentation.)
Daniel Weinstock, Ph.D., Director, Centre de recherche en éthique, Université de Montréal.
10:45 AM to 12 PM
Evidence, which types and why?
Objectives:
• Identifying the different types of evidence that can guide policy decisions and the assessment of their relevance.
• Clarifying the issues related to the use of evidence.
Conceptualizing and classifying evidence
LUNCH 12 PM TO 1:30 PM
1:30 PM to 3 PM
Reviewing evidence, the usefulness and limits of various approaches
Objectives:
• Comparing some of the information sources that can be used to guide decision making.
• Identifying the central theoretical concepts associated with these information sources.
Systematic knowledge reviews
Realistic knowledge reviews
Deliberative processes
3:30 PM to 4:20 PM
Recent examples of the use of evidence within the context of policy decision making
· With reference to a specific case, evaluating the strengths and limitations of using evidence to support policy decisions.
An applied case at the provincial level: The use of cell phones while driving
An applied case at the regional level: Traffic calming in Montreal
Traffic Calming: Evidence for Action
4.6 Mb
Patrick Morency, M.D., M.Sc., FRCP, Medical Specialist in community health, Montréal health and social services agency/ public health branch Louis Drouin, M.D., Medical Specialist, Head of urban environment and health, Montréal health and social services agency/ public health branch |
 |
4:20 PM to 4:30 PM
Response and case analyses
4:30 PM to 4:55 PM
Discussion with participants
4:55 PM to 5 PM
Conclusion of the thematic day
Scientific Committee:
Head: Marie-Christine Hogue, Research Officer, National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy
Geneviève Lapointe, Head of the Équipe Politiques publiques, Institut national de santé publique
Gérald Baril, Scientific Advisor on living habits, Institut national de santé publique du Québec.
Isabelle Veillette, Executive Counsellor, Direction générale adjointe à la mission universitaire, Centre de santé et de services sociaux de la Vieille-Capitale.
Louis Drouin, Medical Specialist, Head of urban environment and health, Montréal health and social services agency, public health branch
François-Pierre Gauvin, Doctoral Candidate, Health Research Methodology, McMaster University
François Benoit, Lead, National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy
Marianne Jacques, Network Development Officer, National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy